Supreme Court

In Royal Canin U. S. A., Inc., v. Wullschleger, No. 23-677, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 365 (2025), the Supreme Court of the United States resolved a circuit split as to whether a plaintiff’s amendment of her complaint after the defendant’s proper removal to federal court can eliminate all federal claims and force remand to state court. This opinion, the Court’s first of 2025, clarifies that federal courts must remand if the amended complaint removes the basis for federal jurisdiction, even if jurisdiction existed at the time of removal. The plaintiff, Ms. Wullschleger, sued Royal Canin in Missouri state court, alleging deceptive […]

On January 15, 2025, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the preponderance of the evidence standard should be used by courts when determining whether an employer has proven that an employee is exempt and not eligible to be paid overtime.[1] Justice Kavanaugh began his opinion by noting that under the Fair Labor Standard Act (“FLSA”) certain categories of employees are exempt from the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. Exempt employees “can range from baseball players to seaman to maple syrup processors to software engineers to fire fighters.” The FLSA places the burden on the employer to show that an […]

In recent years, the Supreme Court has taken a keen interest in harmonizing intellectual property and the free speech protections of the First Amendment.[1] In 2023, the Court held that artist Andy Warhol’s unauthorized use of a photograph of Prince to create a silk screen portrait of the artist was not a protected fair use under the Copyright Act.[2] In the copyright context, fair use carves out a line of demarcation between an author’s right to monopolize his creative expressions and free speech by allowing others to engage in non-infringing uses like critiques, commentary, new reporting, teaching, and research.[3] Fair […]