Menu

Our clients and prospects appreciate our commitment to exceptional responsiveness — 866.983.0866

The Library

News, attorney articles, seminars & events and case studies.

  • All Months
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
  • All Categories
  • News
  • Articles
  • Events
  • Case Studies

AIA’s Standardized Construction Contracts: 2017 Updates Now In Effect

  • Articles

For more than 130 years, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) has offered a set of standardized contracts for architects, contractors, building construction owners and developers that have become the most widely used agreements for commercial construction projects. Every ten years, AIA updates the contracts and, after about 18 months, phases out the previous versions. The latest updates to the most highly used sets of contracts were released in 2017, with the 2007 contracts no longer available online after Oct. 31, 2018.

Properly drawn construction contracts are vital to ensure that major projects can overcome issues or conflicts that arise during the life of the project. Contracts should provide the framework and details for the rights and responsibilities of all parties. Comprehensive and well-designed contracts can minimize the chances of any dispute requiring litigation or arbitration to be resolved.

Here is a list of the core documents updated and a brief summary of the major changes for each:
  • A101: The standard agreement between an owner and contractor for a project with a fixed-amount or lump-sum payment.
  • A102: An agreement for projects contracted for the cost of work plus a fee.
  • A201: The general terms and conditions for the A101 and A102/A103.
  • B101: The agreement between the owner and the architect.

Many of the revisions to the A101 and A102 were the same:

  • Contract time provisions were added to both to determine the official commencement of work and when the work will be substantially completed.
  • Both include a new provision for payment of a termination fee if the contract is canceled for the owner’s convenience, but removed the right of the contractor to recover payment for anticipated overhead and profit of uncompleted work.
  • Retainage provisions have been consolidated in their own section.
  • The contracts specify standards for transmission of digital information, including building models.

Some reversions were unique either to the A101 or A102:

  • The A101 changed requirements for progress payments that require the owner to pay a portion of the contract sum allocable to completed work and materials and equipment stored at the site, while the A202 retains language referring to percentages of completion and a schedule of values.
  • The A102 has added provisions related to cost controls and owner approval of additional costs.
  • The A102 defines what costs of the contractor are reimbursable as cost of the work, and removes some types of employee compensation — bonuses and incentives — from the list of reimbursable costs.

Some of the most important changes were to the A201:

  • Insurance requirements have been moved from Article 11 of the A201 and incorporated into Exhibit A of the construction contracts. This is meant to increase flexibility and make it easier for parties to customize insurance requirements.
  • Requirements for the owner to provide evidence of financial arrangements to satisfy obligations under the contract have been strengthened and clarified.
  • The contractor is now obligated to propose alternate means and methods if there are safety objections to owner-required means and methods rather than wait on instructions from the architect.
  • There are additional requirements for scheduling, including additional milestone dates and more details about the completion of each portion of work.
  • Language has been added requiring that the architect, in serving as role as the Initial Decision Maker, “shall not show partiality to the owner or the contractor.”
  • The A201 adds a new severability clause that allows the bulk of the contract to remain in force even if a court determines that one or more provisions are unenforceable.

Some of the substantial revisions to the B101 include the following:

  • The B101 adopts many provisions that were previously part of the B103, a contract for more complex projects, including more detailed definitions of the project’s physical characteristics, the owner’s budget and proposed scheduling details.
  • The use of the AIA contract E204 is now required if the owner identifies a sustainable objective.
  • As with the A101 and A102 revisions, standards for transmission of digital data are specified.
  • More detail on insurance coverage is included.

You can learn more about the details of the 2017 changes in this PDF of a PowerPoint webinar. There are also comparison texts available on the AIA website that show additions underlined and deletions in strikethrough text.

The most important thing to know, though, whether you are a contractor, business owner or architect, is this: Standard documents can be a useful starting place in the proper development of a construction contract, but they will certainly need work and the eye of a professional attorney to ensure that the finished contract actually fits the project, meets the needs and protects the rights of all involved, and complies with the legal requirements of the state and locality where the construction is taking place.

Associated Attorneys Practices or Specialties Share This
LinkedIn Google+

Gentry Locke attorney wins one of Virginia’s largest verdicts for second consecutive year

ROANOKE, Va. (February 5, 2019) – Gentry Locke is pleased to announce that, for the second consecutive year, a medical malpractice case won by Partner Anthony “Tony” M. Russell has been included in Virginia Lawyers Weekly’s “Virginia’s Largest Verdicts” survey. The Roanoke Circuit Court’s unanimous $1.5 million dollar verdict decision in Alexander Nelson III v. Radiology Associates of Roanoke, P.C. tied for 13th on the 2018 list. Verdicts included on the Largest Verdicts survey represent the largest jury verdicts from across the Commonwealth. In order to be considered, verdicts must be for at least $1 million and must be decided by […]

Read full press release
LinkedIn Google+

HR March Madness: 2019 Employment Law Symposium

Master the brackets and score for your company by attending our 2019 Employment Law Symposium. It’s March Madness, HR style! Gentry Locke’s Employment Law attorneys will help you fill out your employment law brackets so you can successfully advance and WIN for your company. Register now to get a courtside seat for this full day of action! Don’t drop the ball! Early Bird discount ends February 21. Professional Credits: As a SHRM Recertification Provider, Gentry Locke is recognized by SHRM to offer 5.5 hours of Professional Development Credits (PDCs) for the SHRM-CPSM or SHRM-SCPSM for this day of programming. Additionally, […]

Read more.
LinkedIn Google+

Partner Brett Marston inducted into Virginia Law Foundation Fellows Class of 2019

ROANOKE, Va. (January 29, 2019) – Gentry Locke is pleased to announce that Roanoke Partner K. Brett Marston has been inducted into the Virginia Law Foundation Fellows Class of 2019. Inductees were formally honored at the Virginia Law Foundation’s annual dinner on January 24. The Fellows of the Virginia Law Foundation are recognized as leaders in the profession, both in their practices and in their communities. They comprise a group of nearly 500 of the best and brightest legal practitioners who are committed to the highest ideals of the law and to the concept of citizen lawyer. Fellows are nominated […]

Read full press release
LinkedIn Google+

Moderator, Recent Construction Court Cases Panel Discussion

Gentry Locke Partner Herschel Keller moderated a panel of presenters for attendees of the Associated General Contractors (AGC) of Virginia’s 2019 Annual Convention. The convention took place at the Greenbrier in White Sulphur Springs. Herschel is a past president of the Central District Committee for the AGC of Virginia, and services clients in our Lynchburg and Richmond offices.

Read more.
LinkedIn Google+

Supreme Court of the United States denies certiorari in Berkley, et al. v. FERC, et al

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Roanoke, Va. (January 22, 2019) – Today, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Berkley, et al. v. FERC, et al. While Landowners are disappointed that the Court did not take the case, it is important to remember two things: First, the denial of certiorari does not mean the Court necessarily agrees with the decision of the lower court. It simply means the Supreme Court will not address this particular issue at this particular time. Second, the Court receives thousands of petitions every year and it is therefore extremely rare for the Court to […]

Read full press release
LinkedIn Google+

Gentry Locke attorney Christopher M. Kozlowski elevated to Partner

ROANOKE, Va. (January 4, 2019) – The Virginia law firm of Gentry Locke is pleased to announce that Roanoke office attorney Christopher M. Kozlowski has been promoted to the position of Partner, effective January 1, 2019. “I am so pleased to welcome Chris to firm partnership. He is an integral member of the Gentry Locke team, and has successfully handled many important and high-profile matters for our clients,” said Gentry Locke Managing Partner Monica T. Monday. “We are proud of his accomplishments and grateful for his firm leadership, dedication and talents. This promotion is well deserved!” Chris practices on the firm’s General […]

Read full press release
LinkedIn Google+

Gentry Locke Executive Director Frank Pittard named a Virginia Lawyers Weekly “Unsung Legal Hero”

ROANOKE, Va. (January 4, 2019) – The Virginia law firm of Gentry Locke is pleased to announce that Executive Director Frank Pittard has been selected as one of Virginia Lawyers Weekly’s 2018 Unsung Legal Heroes. The award recognizes talented and dedicated legal support professionals who consistently go above and beyond the call of duty, often behind the scenes. Frank was named a “Hero” in the Firm Administrator category. Other categories included: Human Resources Professional, IT/Operations, Law Librarian, Legal Marketing Professional, Legal Secretary, Receptionist and Paralegal. “Frank has made us very proud. He is a crucial component of the firm’s ongoing […]

Read full press release
LinkedIn Google+